Recently added books

Secret Societies

Creator: Beecher, Edward, 1803-1895, Blanchard, Jonathan, 1811-1892, MacDill, David, 1826-1903
Translator: -
Contributor: -
Editor: -


Brand new books:


CONTENTS. I. A TREATISE BY REV. D. MACDILL. CHAPTER I. THEIR ANTIQUITY. CHAPTER II. THEIR SECRECY. CHAPTER III. OATHS AND PROMISES. CHAPTER IV. PROFANENESS. CHAPTER V. THEIR EXCLUSIVENESS. CHAPTER VI. FALSE CLAIMS. II. SHALL CHRISTIANS JOIN SECRET SOCIETIES? BY JONATHAN BLANCHARD, D. D. III. REPORT TO CONGREGATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS. BY EDWARD BEECHER, D. D. CHAPTER I. THEIR ANTIQUITY.
The Collection of Antiquities

THE COLLECTION OF ANTIQUITIES BY HONORE DE BALZAC Translated By Ellen Marriage DEDICATION To Baron Von Hammer-Purgstall, Member of the Aulic Council, Author of the History of the Ottoman Empire. Dear Baron,--You have taken so warm an interest in my long, vast "History of French Manners in the Nineteenth Century," you have given me so much encouragement to persevere with my work, that you
1. Secret associations are of very ancient origin. They existed among the ancient Egyptians, Hindoos, Grecians, Romans, and probably among nearly all the pagan nations of antiquity. This fact, however is neither proof of their utility nor of their harmlessness. Slavery, despotism, cruelty, drunken falsehood, and all sorts of sins and crimes have been practiced from time immemorial, but are none the less to be reprobated on that account. 2. The facts that these associations had no existence among the Israelites, who, alone of all the ancient nations, enjoyed the light of Divine revelation, and that they originated and flourished among the heathen, who were vain in their imaginations; whose foolish heart was darkened, and whom God gave up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts (Rom. i: 21-24), is a presumptive proof that their nature and tendency are evil. We do not claim that all the institutions among God's ancient people were right and good; nor that every institution among the heathen was sinful and injurious; still, that which was so popular among those whom the Bible declares to have been filled with all unrighteousness; that which was so pleasing to men whom God had given over to a reprobate mind and to vile affections (Rom. i: 26-28); that which made a part of the worship which the ignorant heathen offered up to their unclean gods, and which was unknown among God's chosen people, is certainly a thing to be viewed with suspicion. A thing of so bad origin and so bad accompaniments we should be very slow to approve. The fact that many good men see no